Skip to main content

Quick Review: Xiaomi Mi Mix

Xiaomi's newest flagship device manages to break many conventions, as well as potentially trailing the look of future smartphones from more familiar names like Apple and Samsung.

Despite packing decent late-2016 specifications, the Mi Mix is all about its screen and bezels. Or more accurately, its screen and missing bezels, because the 6.4" 1080p+ screen runs from edge to edge and right to the top edge. Including, uniquely, right into the rounded corners.

On first sight the Mix is jaw-dropping. Its Ceramic build is pretty impressive before you even turn the screen on. Once you do however... everyone who saw me using it stopped to comment. In fact the most common reaction was to whip out their iPhone Plus (usually) and marvel at the disparity in screen size and quality for such a similarly sized device.

Get past the wonder of the screen and things aren't always as impressive. Performance-wise, the Snapdragon 821 and 4GB RAM keeps things humming along nicely. However you'll be running the Xiaomi in-house MIUI 8.0 skin which, like most Chinese OEM's skins, lacks an app drawer. You'll also not find Google Mobile Services here, so no Play Store or indeed any of Google's Android apps. Fortunately Amazon's App Store runs fine here.

The Mix's 16Mp rear camera is passable, but barely so for what is a premium device. It's in a whole different league though when compared to the front facing selfie camera. Having done away with the top bezel, Xiaomi has had to move all of the sensors that normally reside up there down to the bottom chin. That includes the selfie camera and it's a move that really hasn't worked.

Images taken with the front camera exhibit significant distortion in the vertical - somewhat akin to the view a fish gets looking up from the bottom of a deep pond, I imagine. Inverting the phone marginally improves matters but the best you can hope for is a landscape selfie that distorts things in the horizontal plane, but seems to produce a more acceptable result.

Back to the screen again and even allowing for the impressive display to surface area ratio, you might find that there are some glitches to contend with. The resolution is an obscure 2040x1080 and those extra 120 pixels over true 1080p can cause problems.  In a number of apps the odd aspect ratio of the screen confuses the display decisions and you'll find that either the sides of the app get cut off or sidebars are displayed to restore the 1080p aspect ratio.

Summing up then, the Mix is amazing in some areas and average in others. The screen is big, bright and goes places that others don't. Paired with the materials used in construction, Xiaomi have managed to build something that is every inch a premium device. If the review stopped here then we would be talking about the most impressive smartphone ever assembled.

The cameras are a disappointment though and MIUI could really do with an option to choose to have an app drawer, rather than dump icons onto your home screen. The absence of Google's Mobile Services is currently a problem, however should Xiaomi choose to export it officially , that could easily be fixed. There's no micro SD slot, but with the only storage options being 128GB or 256GB that's probably one that most could overlook.

Even so, the Mi Mix is a technical achievement Xiaomi can be proud of. At a price of NZ$1299 for the 128GB version it seriously undercuts both the Google Pixel XL ($1649) and iPhone 7 Plus ($1629) whilst out-blinging both comprehensively. Had it squeezed a better camera in to the Mix I'd have gone as far as to say it deserved a place on your shopping list alongside either.

As it is, if you want to stand out from the crowd (whilst attracting a crowd around you) and can live with the cameras this might just be the phone for you. Anybody else need not apply.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…