Skip to main content

Nokia's iPhone Response Revisited: How A Market Leader Fell

When Apple announced the iPhone in 2007 Nokia was the world leader in phone technology and sales. Its smartphones ran versions of Symbian which, when combined, gave it first place in the smartphone market too. Nokia was the world number one in mobile communications everywhere outside the US.

Apple effectively gave Nokia a year's grace to respond to the iPhone. As previously discussed, that first device was horribly flawed and, as a bonus for Nokia, wasn't even available outside of the United States for most of its lifecycle.

How did Nokia respond to the iPhone so badly? Why did they fail to respond for so long? Nokia's iPhone competitor didn't arrive until October 2008 - 22 months after the iPhone launched and three months after Apple released the historically significant second generation iPhone, the 3G.

First of all Nokia was guilty of arrogance. Interviewed the day of the iPhone launch Pekka Pohjakallio, head of the company's smartphone division, called it "very exciting for us". Now there's a man who likes his excitement dark.

Presumably Nokia bought itself some iPhones, took them apart, used them and based on the information it gleaned, went out and designed a phone to take on its new challenger.

Then they threw it away and released the N5800 instead. A phone so bad that even the biggest, most loyal fanbase in the world wouldn't buy it. S60 was pretty poor before Nokia tried to graft a touch interface onto it. Afterwards it was abysmal. The phone was less than reliable too.

It was a problem that was to plague Nokia right up until the point it decided to abandon Symbian. Replacement phones, targeted with bringing Apple back down to earth were poorly designed, poorly implemented and unreliable. The damage to Nokia's reputation and competitiveness was marked. When the potentially brilliant N8 was launched as a last gasp effort to save S60, it failed to generate any kind of bounce. It was inevitable that a platform change was coming - the rest is history.

Yet Nokia had a potential competitor to the iPhone warming up in the wings before Apple even released its first device. Maemo, which had until then powered Nokia's internet tablets, had great potential and offered a much higher starting point, given its day one touch first design.

Politics within the company meant that the Maemo group were starved of resources and support within Nokia and as a result the project died having only ever released on phone.

HMD's release of new Android phones bearing the Nokia name at CES and at the upcoming MWC will no doubt garner interest from many quarters - not least the Nokia fans the company left behind as it lurched from one smartphone disaster to the next.

With a much tighter ship, better hardware processes and no input into the OS, this new Nokia seems a lot more likely to succeed than old Nokia ever did.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.