Skip to main content

After A Poor 2016 How Is Apple Going To Move The Needle On iPad Sales?


After Apple reported its executives had been hit in the pay packet for its poor performance in 2016 there can no longer be any denying that the company's leadership team has been missing goals with new products.

Sales have been down in all three of its main hardware earners, iPhone, Mac and iPad. In the latter its been a multi year trend which suggests that Apple has no innovation to offer in the tablet market. With the Mac market falling too - and recent announcements having been poorly received, one can't help but wonder whether the malaise will end at the iPad.

Reputationally Apple needs to fix the iPad sales slump with some compelling new devices. The iPad Pros may have persuaded Apple's customers to buy more expensive devices, but they were a failure in outright sales numbers and overall numbers continued to fall through 2016.

Apple's short term fix, if the rumours are to be believed, will be to launch three new iPads in the near future - two Pros and a replacement Air. The former will stay much as they are, possibly with an iPhone-like 'S' model that upgrades to better internals, whilst the latter is suggested to be a new, narrow bezel device with a 10.5" display.

That doesn't sound like a game changing strategy to me. It also ignores the iPad Mini again, even though smaller tablets (and cheaper prices) seem to draw in more buyers across the tablet market as a whole.

If Apple fails to fix the iPad and isn't able to resolve its Mac crisis, how likely is it to be able to maintain its iPhone success? At the point where shareholder value begins to suffer as a result of too many unambitious upgrades, Apple's management team could find itself in a very sticky position.

It's amazing to think that the people responsible for the world's most profitable company are just a few poor quarters away from replacement, but in a world where Nokia, IBM and Blackberry are around to remind us what happens to companies who are slow to recognise the market changing under them, I think that may just be the case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…