Skip to main content

New Nokia Must Avoid Mistakes Of Old Nokia


HMD Global will launch new smartphones bearing the Nokia name early next year and the hype is already building ahead of the introduction. The general feeling is that old Nokia was undone by the decision to switch from Symbian to Windows Phone.

That's not the entire truth though. Nokia spent four years blowing its lead in the smartphone business. It failed to respond to the iPhone. In fact its response to the iPhone was the 5800. A phone so ridiculously bad its hard to believe that Nokia had a whole year from the launch of the iPhone to refine it.

By the time that Stephen Elop announced Nokia's switch to Windows Phone it was already in dire straits. That the announcement came so far ahead of the release of its first Windows Phone didn't help matters. Elop's burning platform memo arrived in February, the first Nokia Lumia phones were revealed in October. For the intervening ten months Nokia was getting by on selling technology so bad it had already announced its death.

As I've discussed before, Nokia had the platform to replace Symbian and take on the iPhone and Android even before the iPhone arrived. It launched the 770 Internet Tablet in early 2005. It took six years before that platform made it onto a phone. The N9 launched after Elop had announced the switch to Windows Phone, so was unsurprisingly DOA. Political infighting and the strength of the Symbian division had damaged the Maemo team's ability to deliver what would have been a phone to compete with the iPhone (and probably pre-empt the growth of Android) had it released three years earlier.

Between 2007 and 2011 Nokia released one garbage Symbian device after another. There were phones that looked promising on paper - the N97 and N8 for example - but two minutes experience of Symbian on them was enough to send even the staunchest Nokia fan running into Apple's arms.

So what of HMD's new Nokia offerings? They cannot just be another Android phone in a forest of great Android phones. To beat out Samsung, these will have to be high end phones delivering great customer experience. Trading on the Nokia name alone is a fast path to failure - as Blackberry will happily testify.

The suggestion has always been that a 2011 decision to go Android over Windows Phone would have saved Nokia. Looking at profitable companies in the Android market, I'm not sure that would be the case. In fact I'm pretty sure that without Microsoft subsidies and most favoured nation status, Nokia would have failed faster and harder than it eventually did.

So good as it is to see the Nokia name back on a smartphone, there's still some way to go before we can say that Nokia is truly back in the market it once led.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…