Skip to main content

More Thoughts On The Touch Bar

Having previously tried the entry-level MacBook Pro, the only new MBP feature | hadn't been able to try was the new, function key replacing, Touch Bar.

Purely from an aesthetic point of view the Touch Bar is a pleasant addition to the MBP. The OLED screen is sharp and bright; it looks exciting on first acquaintance. Good thing too, because to use it you will be spending a lot of time looking at it. It isn't intuitive or natural to use.

By default the Touch Bar shows brightness and volume controls and the esc key. In the old Apple paradigm you pressed the F1 or F2 keys to change the brightness; F11 or F12 keys to change volume. That becomes a tap, finger move and slide in the new model.

The old way is better. Still, the ability to morph those keys must have significant payback, right?

Well possibly, but only when apps use the feature. Not all of Apple's do, never mind third-parties. Even when they do the benefits are hard to quantify. Safari, for example, offers the address bar when opened, the ability to swipe between tabs if you have more than one. Except that in both cases you don't benefit from the Touch Bar.

Open Safari from scratch and the insertion point is in the address bar anyway. The re is absolutely no need to use the Touch Bar at this point. Also when you are browsing in Safari your hands are already on the trackpad. A swipe and a dick get you to your new / next tab without having to move your hand from the trackpad, where you'll want it for browsing that tab. Using the Touch Bar means a change of interaction method. Two in fact, neither offering any kind of benefit.

Then if you're new tab happens to blast out music at full volume you have the missing volume keys to contend with. How quickly will you be able to mute your audio when you have to navigate the Touch Bar before getting to the controls.

And there's the crux of the problem. Everything on the Touch Bar has to be replicated on screen for compatibility reasons. It is, therefore, pretty useless. As a crutch to MacOS's limited touch capabilities it is weak. The effort made to fix that shortfall would have been a far better investment in the long run.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.