Skip to main content

Microsoft Bullish On Surface, Talks Down MacBook Pro


Microsoft seems to be lining up a big year sales for its Surface hardware division. In fact according to Brian Hall, head of Device Marketing, things are going from good to better for all things Surface.

Following the announcement of the Surface Studio Microsoft received much critical acclaim. Well-earned too. Surprisingly though, there's been a knock on effect on Surface Pro and Book sales, with record sales to consumers recorded in November.

In the US it would seem many of those buyers are switching from a Mac, at least that's what numbers from Microsoft’s Mac trade in program would suggest

Then there’s the Surface Hub. The giant – and hugely expensive – enterprise wall mount PC has racked up big sales and would appear to be another billion dollar revenue stream for Microsoft.

Whilst Surfaces have been going great guns, it seems Microsoft can’t get over its fixation with Apple, in the post Hall calls out ‘disappointment’ with the new MacBook Pro.

It’s an interesting strategy because it hasn’t really worked for Microsoft in the past and doesn’t seem likely to in the future either. Microsoft wins when it talks about the quality of its products and lets them speak for themselves. The Surface Studio launch was a perfect example of that.

There’s little doubt that the arrival of the new MBP will result in a bounce of Apple’s Mac sales when they are reported in January. That’s despite a weak launch and plenty of criticism in reviews.

Microsoft’s achievements with the Surface line shouldn’t be tainted by continual comparison with Apple. In just four years Microsoft has built itself a multi-billion dollar PC hardware division that stands comparison with anything on the market.

That’s the good news message that Microsoft should be sharing.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…