Skip to main content

Magic Leap Faked Video Demos

The Information has a piece alleging a less than subtle piece of mis-direcetion by Google-backed Magic Leap. The AR company apparently faked the impressive demo for its AR headset last year, using computer animators to fake the AR experience that Magic Leap was claiming.

It's alleged that this piece of chicanery was the driver behind around $1.4bn in investments.

The truth is the technology Magic Leap has developed doesn't appear to work properly, nor will it easily miniaturize to even the headset size that Microsoft's competing HoloLens is currently shipping to developers.

In fact the animation team responsible leaked details of a full head helmet-sized device requiring multiple connections to a PC. In other words a completely unusable AR experience.

Microsoft has undertaken a number of live demos of its products, including allowing customers and developers to experience the brilliance of the solution first-hand.

That's something Magic Leap is a long way from being able to do.

Its not surprising Magic Leap has struggled with getting this right. Microsoft has several years of experience with the Kinect sensor before the HoloLens broke cover. Given that the two products do very similar things its no surprise that Microsoft has managed to forge a lead in AR.

Sony tried to build something similar with the Vita handheld, early versions shipping with AR cards that could be used to merge real world and virtual environments at a very basic level. Similarly it has a number of software lenses for its Xperia handsets that attempt AR with a limited degree of success.

Magic Leap is clearly sitting somewhere between Sony and Microsoft in what it can achieve, but it would appear that it doesn't yet have any way of making the technology small enough to be viable.

If investors feel that the company duped them, they many never get the funding they need to do so.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…