Skip to main content

Does TCL Have A Big Play Coming In The Smartphone Space


You may have heard a little about TCL recently after it acquired an exclusive license to  build and sell phones under the Blackberry brand. Interesting decision, to take a failed mobile brand and hope to rejuvenate it.

This isn't its first such move though and I'm wondering whether TCL is lining itself up for a much bigger push into the smartphone space in 2017.

Blackberry is obviously a hugely important name in smartphone history, however it failed to react quickly enough to the iPhone and Android and its final phones were interesting rather than desirable.

Tellingly, the best smartphones wearing the Balckberry brand have been the DTEK devices launched in the last few months. Phones that are rebadged versions of Alcatel devices, manufactured by TCL.

TCL has the rights to manufacture phones under the Alcatel brand as a result of its buyout of Alcatel from its original joint venture. Whilst Alcatel isn't the biggest name in smartphones, its recent Windows 10 Mobile Idol 4S was a statement of intent. A move out of its core Android market and  into a higher market sector, albeit in insanely niche one.

Blackberry and Alcatel aren't the only brands TCl is packing though. It also purchased the Palm brand from HP not so very long ago and to me this could prove to be the place where it can apply real pressure to break into the mainstream market.

Everyone loves Palm. Its especially strong in the US and paired with a Blackberry stablemate and a focused Alcatel brand for Europe, TCL has opportunities to grow its business through 2017.

These old brands are no guarantee of success - nostalgia can only carry you so far - but decent devices can have their desirability elevated by playing on that nostalgia. Be interesting to see how TCL plays out its hand next year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…