Skip to main content

Apple Is Terribly Wrong About Touchscreens On Macs

For part of this week I've been using my MacBook Air - a machine that set the gold standard for laptops for so long and is only now, after almost six years on the market, starting to look like a tired design.

Internally the i5 processor and 4GB are more than enough to keep up with the sort of software I run. However in other ways it is as outdated as the landline telephone and public telephone box.

The reason is the absence of a touchscreen. Furthermore I can say with some confidence that the presence of the Touch Bar on the newest MacBook Pros is a very weak alternative that underscores just how desperate the Mac is for a full refresh.

For those days when I was using the MBA I yearned to have my super-flexible, touch friendly, stylus-toting Spectre x360 back.

The truth is that the MBA was least useful the one place I needed it to perform the most - in my lap. I couldn't flip it into a better orientation when reading and reviewing documents, I couldn't drag things around on screen to interact with them, every screen interaction required a trackpad action and there was no option to flip it round to tablet mode to write on the screen.

Nothing about the new MacBooks (Pro or otherwise) suggests to me that it will address any of these problems.

My gut feeling is that Apple is busy talking down touchscreens whilst it tries to re-engineer MacOS to support touch. When its ready it will launch the new touchscreen MacBooks as if no other touchscreen laptop ever existed before. It has form for this behaviour. It's only a matter of time, I'm sure. 


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…