Skip to main content

This Looks Like A Fine Reason To Walk Away From Google

A number of sites are reporting that upwards of 200 users have had their Google accounts suspended after buying and selling-on Pixel phones from the company's Project Fi carrier.

The reason for doing so was to take advantage of the New Hampshire State sales tax - it doesn't have one. Customers bought their phones and then had them delivered to a New Hampshire reseller who sold them on and split the profit with the original customer.

So let's examine this whole process from a consumer's point of view.

First, Google sells you a phone that it prohibits you from reselling. However this isn't a piece of software or artwork, you aren't buying a license to the phone. This is a physical product whose title transfers to you at the point of sale. Google has no interest in the product at the point where the purchase has completed and has no legal right to dictate what you do with your phone from then on.

Next the response. Banning access to a person's Google account potentially denies them access to email, documents and photographs that exist nowhere else and are effectively lost to the user, punishing them for an incident unrelated to any of those services.

Aside from the disproportionate level of response, this kind of action set a a precedent. Google has a Mafia-like protection racket going on here. Do as I say or the files get hurt.

The is untenable behaviour from a company promoting the use of the cloud as an alternative to local storage. If you're all in with Google, it may be time to reassess that relationship ahead of the day when the company takes exception to something you've done and brings the ban hammer to bear against your use of its cloud services.

iCloud may be a disaster of Hollywood epic proportions, but right now I'd say that Apple's incompetence trumps Google's malevolence all ends up.

On the plus side, thank heavens for OneDrive.



Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…