Skip to main content

Premium Smartphones: Is It The Hardware Or The Software?

I had the opportunity to try out two relatively new phones yesterday and it was interesting contrasting their build, features, capability and price.

The two phones were the Google Pixel XL, a phone that retails for NZ$1649 in the 128GB version; and  the Asus Zenfone 3, exactly $1000 cheaper in its 64GB, $649 version.

Both phones sport a premium build, rear mounted fingerprint sensors and 5.5" screens. The Pixel has a higher resolution QuadHD AMOLED screen, whilst the Zenfone has a 1080p IPS+ display. Side by side there's little between them. The Pixel has the usual AMOLED saturation advantages, but the Zenfone's display is as good as an IPS panel gets.

In other areas the hardware swings in the Zenfone's favour - it's metal and glass body is an awful lot cleaner than the Pixel, with its silly half glass window on the rear panel. You also benefit from expandable memory or a second SIM slot on the Asus.

The Pixel obviously wins in software - it has the latest and greatest Android release with Google's Pixel-only Assistant. In normal use though I'd have to question how much of an advantage this really is, for now. The expectation of speedy and ongoing software updates probably add up to the Pixel's biggest advantage.

So what's the most important part of a premium smartphone? Is it the hardware - in which case the Pixel struggles to justify its price premium over the cheaper Zenfone - or is the software, in which case, with you could update to the newest Zenfone three times for the cost of the Pixel, getting new versions of Android along the way.

The Zenfone is far from the only mid-range smartphone that the Pixel's over the top pricing pricing makes look attractive - and that's without considering the NZ$250 premium over the infinitely better Galaxy S7 Edge or the $450 and $550 premium Google is seeking over the just as premium LG V20 and Xperia XZ.

Until such time as Google starts to seriously fork Android in favour of the Pixel. I'm struggling to see who would actually choose to buy one.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…