Skip to main content

Continuum Could Drive Adoption Of Smaller Phones

Windows Mobile's Continuum functionality offers an interesting possibility for future smartphone buyers - the ability to have the smaller phone in their pocket that they demand whilst still being able to connect a larger screen for 'big picture' functionality.

Whilst only Microsoft does this right now there's no reason why Android or iOS users shouldn't gain the same functionality - in fact at least some of this capability is available on both the major mobile platforms.

The key to Continuum is that it allows the use of a larger screen and input device than the phone itself can handle. That's been exploited solely for the mobile to desktop category so far, but why stop there.

Imagine instead an iPhone SE sized device performing your day to day mobile needs, but also being able to attach to a larger iPad-like screen to become a tablet too. Add in a lap dock style accessory and the desktop dock functionality already demonstrated by HP and you really have one device that does everything.

Of course for Apple its probably a no go. Reducing the number of iPads it sells would be impossible to stomach. Android users can do a lot of this today. Except that I know of no current Android device that supports either second screen capability or the passback of keyboard and mouse inputs over Miracast. Both those items are Windows 10 Mobile exclusives.

Still, the concept itself is sound. Especially given the popularity of the iPhone SE (and to a lesser extent the Xperia Compact line). A powerful but but small smartphone will always have a ready market. A powerful but small smartphone with the ability to become a tablet, laptop or desktop becomes so much more.

Whilst its only Microsoft offering this capability don't expect to see it go mainstream any time soon.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…