Skip to main content

With The Note 7 Disaster, Can We Finally Put The Metal Unibody Myth To Bed Now

mozo 950 zebra wood

Samsung’s problems with the Note 7 don’t look like they’re ending anytime soon and that’s disappointing for what is such a desirable device. However, as I said when the news of the battery problems first broke this problem is partially a result of Samsung moving to a metal unibody design and sealing in its battery.

Yes, it’s true that the problem isn’t a result of the non-removable battery per se, however if we were talking about a device with the Note 4 design – that is a removable back cover and user replaceable battery – the problem wouldn’t have been half as difficult for Samsung to fix, would have cost  a fraction of the costs that Samsung has burnt through so far and would have left the Samsung brand in a far better place.

The argument for metal unibodies has been that they add a premium feel to a device. The solid, single piece of cut aluminium feels like an expensive watch or tool. That’s a ridiculous assertion. Good design will make a phone feel great to hold irrespective of the material used to create it.

Of all the metal phones that I’ve had the dubious pleasure of trying a mere handful have actually been pleasant to hold. The iPhone 4 / 5 design, which is good to hold and to look at; the HTC Desire HD, rode nicely in the hand (and managed a removable battery too) and… well, that’s about it. I’ve found no other metal phone that has been anything but clumsy to hold in the hand.

Personally I’d say the combination of a metal frame and polycarbonate rear cover to be an ideal solution, but I’m also quite happy to use an all polycarbonate phone – most Nokia Lumia for example.

Right now I have on my desk an iPhone 6, a Galaxy S6 and a Lumia 950. Two phones are in cases because they are impossible to hold comfortably or without the risk of dropping. One sits in its naked form. That the Lumia 950 feels the most comfortable of the three to use is a win for plastic and removable rear covers. That I can swap it out for a leather, wood or even a different coloured plastic back is great.

At this point the fact that I can easily replace the battery is just a bonus.

For Samsung its absence is going to turn out to be a very expensive design error. By the time it has recalled and scrapped the two and half million Note 7 handsets it has shipped out (some of them twice) accounted for the damage to its reputation and brand; and paid out compensation for consequential damage from the phones that ignited, the decision to go metal unibody will have cost the company more than $10bn.

That’s been a very expensive lesson.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…