Skip to main content

When Tim Cook Says Apple Will Kill Cash Bankers Should Start Worrying


Apple Pay recently rolled out to a handful of new countries and with Watch, Web and iPhone integration there are plenty of opportunites for Apple to grow the payments side of its business.

However Tim Cook revealed more aggressive ambitions for the service in an interview with Nikkei: Apple wants to kill off cash.

That's a ridiculous statement to make, taken at face value. Apple Pay is available to hardly anyone and even for those  who can get it, merchants who accepted contactless payments are far from ubiquitous.

Here in Auckland cash is almost never used. The banks, the low tariff EFTPOS system for merchants and easy peer to peer payments, are all amongst the methods that local banks use to reduce friction and remove the need to carry cash. 

Right now the only time I handle cash is when the tooth fairy needs to pay one of my kids a visit.

This is the cashless future I think Tim Cook is talking about. Financial transactions exclusively handled by smartphone. Apple Pay does payments but all of the other things that we do will eventually migrate there too. There's a good reason why FinTech is the next disruptor on everybody's mind at the moment.

For traditional banks there's some serious risk involved here. Imagine for a moment, if Apple were to bring its smartphone market penetration and enormous financial backing to bear on the banking industry. To become a true bank with no branches. Get paid into your iTunes Bank Account and do all your financial business from your smartphone.

Think it unlikely? How about if I told you that Sony's Financial Services division earned more than $0.5bn profit and using exactly this model has been one of the company's best performing divisions for years?

Now imagine what Apple could do in the same space. For banks and bankers - especially in territories resisting Apple Pay - this sounded like a warning shot from Tim Cook. You don't want Apple to enter your market sector.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…