Skip to main content

Tablet Market Down 10%. Hybrids Up 25% – Tell Me Again Why The MacBook Pro Has No Touchscreen

ipad pro

Strategy Analytics has given us its view of tablet sales in the last quarter and they make pretty grim reading – sales are down by 10% overall and nearly a third of the market is taken by white box vendors, the low-end devices that rebadged by various retailers around the world.

At the same time we’re being told that the 2-in-1 hybrid market is booming, with sales up by 25%. Those PC vendors who caught on to the trend early are seeing rewards as the devices get into second or even third generation iterations. When Samsung dropped the. previously Android exclusive. ‘Galaxy’ name onto the TabPro S – a Windows 2-in-1 – it marked out a sea change in OEM thinking.

For everyone except Apple, for whom the touchscreen laptop is the wrong tool. After the launch of the MacBook Pro Apple’s senior executives went full-press on the media to explain why the, frankly ridiculous, Touch Bar was better than a touch screen. It isn’t. It never will be. And Apple full well knows it. Otherwise it wouldn’t be proposing the iPad Pro as a computer.

Touchscreens and the flexibility to use them in different configurations are what define a current state of the art laptop and Apple doesn’t have one.

The problem for Apple appears to be that making OS X touch friendly is going to be very difficult. Remember the pain the Microsoft went through with Windows 8? Apple doesn’t want to go through that for the sake of perhaps as few as 15 million sales a year. Not when the highly profitable iPhone sells that number about every ten days. The iPad outsold the Mac better than two to one last quarter, despite the shrinking tablet market.

Right now I think Apple is paying lip service to the desktop in the same way that Microsoft is paying lip service to mobile. The unibody MBP came out in 2008, the Retina update (which in itself was minimal) arrived in 2012. In the intervening four years Apple managed to achieve what exactly? From being perhaps the best laptop you can buy the MBP has gone to being an also-ran, with dated design, restricted capabilities and poor value for money. Apple’s Mac design and engineering teams just seem to have phoned this one in.

Apple has slipped behind Microsoft, HP, Lenovo, Asus and even Acer in industrial design. Even Dell produces more exciting hardware than Apple. Imagine a time in history when we could say that? Even in the darkest Sculley / Amelio days, prior to Steve Jobs return, that was never the case.

The part of me that sees Apple as an innovator would like to believe that OS X will get touch capabilities and a MacBook sporting a touchscreen will follow. After all this wouldn’t be the first time that Apple has railed against a technology it couldn’t deliver right up until the point when it could. However the part of me that sees Tim Cook as the salesman thinks that Apple will pay lip service to OS X for as long as it takes them to develop iOS into a fully capable desktop platform.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.