Skip to main content

Surface Studio Just Hammered On Apple's Weak Spot

The new Surface Studio Microsoft announced today is more than just an extension of Microsoft's hardware line, it's a direct challenge to Apple's iMac and for a first attempt at a machine aimed at the creatives who make up Apple's key desktop market, it looks like a winner to me.

The Surface Studio manages to look better at every single task or use case, with the iMac left looking outdated, clunky and limited. For a company which has led from the front for so long that is a dangerous thing to have to face.

At tomorrow's Apple launch event there is likely to be new hardware. But does any of it even promise a hint of the kind of capability that the Surface Studio offers? The iMac might get a new screen, it may get a processor boost, but is it likely to get the flexibility of the Studio Zero Gravity Hinge? The control of the Surface Dial or the total integration of touch that Windows 10 offers?

I very much doubt it.

For anyone running any kind of creative studio the Surface Studio just went to the top of their 'buy' list. An iPad Pro and an iMac just isn't going to cut it anymore.

I've been saying that Apple needs to update OS X to integrate touch and redesign its hardware to support more flexible use of touch and traditional control methods. That it has failed to do so and in the process allowed Microsoft to get the jump on it says a lot about the way that Apple works now.

Tim Cook is about the dollars and cents. We've yet to see anything approaching a design masterpiece under his stewardship. Nor have we seen anything visionary that moves Apple and computing forward.

An Apple led by Steve Jobs may not have been as profitable or grown as quickly, but I think it would have seen past the poor execution of the first Surfaces and noted the potential of both touch and hybrid devices. As it is, Apple will inevitably have to merge iOS and OS X into something more capable or risk losing its home field to Microsoft of all people.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…