Skip to main content

Samsung And Apple Had Troubled Third Quarter Sales

sales report

IDC published its smartphone sales figures for Q3 and both Apple and Samsung had a weak showing, for different reasons.

Samsung sales were down by over 11m units when compared to the same period last year, almost exactly the number of Note 7 sales it would have expected to score in the quarter. Given that large numbers of the 2.5m customers who received Note 7s chose to replace it with another Samsung device, the news is rather worse than it looks on paper. Its unlikely that things will improve much in Q4 either.

Apple’s sales slowdown either reflects a shortage of iPhone 7 hardware in the short period it was on sale in the quarter, or a much harder stop for iPhone 6S sales ahead of the new device launch.

On the winners side of the card, Huawei took another large step to displacing Apple as number two in the market, almost halving the gap in unit sales. The next couple of quarters should be relatively safe for Apple, given its traditional strong sales in the holiday season. Next year could prove to be something of a problem though.

Behind Huawei, OPPO had a stellar quarter, more than doubling sales and taken number one spot in its home market of China. It halved the sales gap to Huawei. In fifth place vivo did similarly well also more than doubling sales year on year.

With the others category (containing big names like Sony, LG and HTC as well as smaller ones like Microsoft, Blackberry, Asus and Alcatel) shrinking fast, we’re approaching a time when the big five own 66% of the market. For anyone looking at scale for profit, rather than selling individual handsets at a profit, that must be a pretty scary prospect.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…