Skip to main content

Review: SurfacePad For iPad

I've somewhat neglected my iPad since Windows devices with touchscreens became part of my technology toolkit. For good reason, across a range of use cases the iPad loses out to a real computer. However that doesn't mean that there aren't times when the iPad isn't the best tool for the job, so I'll still grab it for occasional use.

When I bought the iPad Air 2 the choice of cases were either Apple's Smart Cover - something I'd never really liked on previous iPads - or a range of well know and not so well known names selling variations of more enclosing cases. I picked a case from a reasonably well known brand, who I won't identify here, but which proved to be less than solid, gradually breaking down into its constituent pieces.

So when I happened across one of Twelve South's SurfacePad skins for the iPad in the bargain bin at a local Apple dealer I had to grab it. Previous experience with the SurfacePad for iPhone led me to expect a well designed, protective, yet thin and light cover, and I haven't been disappointed.

The SurfacePad uses a high grab, non-permanent adhesive to attach to the back of the iPad. Leaving what is mostly a single thickness of leather between you and the iPad itself. No bulk, no weight and the feel of a really good quality notebook.

It isn't going to protect your iPad if it falls from your desk, but for preventing the screen or rear of the case picking up scratches in day to day use it's perfect.

In use the SurfacePad ticks all the boxes, with multiple typing and viewing angles catered for by magnets in the cover. Automatic wake and sleep are activated by the same mechanism.

The same basic design covers all iPads bar the 12" Pro. It's far and away the best case I've seen or felt on an iPad. So unless your normal usage of your iPad involves significant rough and tumble, in which case you need something far more protective, the SurfacePad is my recommended case for iPad owners.



Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…