Skip to main content

Microsoft's NFL Surface Deal Looking A Little Sour Now


I think the general consensus of opinion is that Microsoft took three goes to get the Surface tablet right, but when it did finally all click - with the Surface Pro 3 - Microsoft had a winner on its hands. Putting to one side two decades of consumer and media apathy, Microsoft had its first real consumer hit since Windows 95.

The deal to get the tablet used on the sidelines by NFL coaching staff seemed like the icing on the cake. A big win for a company that struggles to score points in marketing.

And then they started getting used and the problems began.

First sportscasters were calling the Surfaces iPads - hardly ideal marketing material. Then problems started occurring. Ironically not with the Surfaces, but because Microsoft and the Surface were in the frontline it was the Surface that took the brunt of the bad publicity. When wireless problems knocked out the tablets it was reported as a problem with Microsoft's tablet.

The we had the video of Bill Belichick smashing his NFL provided Surface in frustration - a video that went viral and there was no question what sort of tablet was being used that day.

Belichick has now taken the damage a step further, in a press conference last night he slammed the concept of electronic tablets and the infrastructure that supports them, giving vent to frustrations that have built up over the season.

Belichick's team, the Patriots, will be going back to good old pen and paper for the rest of the season. Microsoft will probably need to reconsider its $400m deal with the NFL and customers (in the US anyway) will probably take another turn down the iPad aisle next time they're shopping for a new machine.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…