Skip to main content

Is Microsoft Following A Strategy Or Just Thrashing About Blindly?

microsoftband2

Other than the well-publicised ‘mobile first, cloud first’ slogan Microsoft doesn’t appear to have a clue what its actually doing, with communication being vague and providing conflicting advice, actions being inconsistent and each part of the business apparently acting in isolation, with no view of what other divisions are doing.

For example, Microsoft Health, Microsoft Band and Microsoft’s aspirations for being a player in the future Healthcare provider market.

A couple of weeks ago rumours started circulating that Microsoft would no longer be manufacturing its band app. So far, so unsurprising. After all the Band only made sense for Windows Mobile users and Microsoft’s decision to abandon the consumer smartphone market would effectively kill sales anyway. Yesterday Microsoft confirmed to ZDNet’s Mary-Jo Foley that the Band 2 was being cleared and no replacement was coming.

So in the intervening time why did Microsoft feel the need to rename it’s cross platform Health app to Band? There can be no logic underpinning this move, unless it marks an unlikely end to Microsoft’s health aspirations.

It isn’t the only area where logic seems to have been thrown out of the window. Microsoft has been banging the drum for cross platform apps, UWP and the ease with which its tools allow third-parties to migrate apps to Windows 10. Yet the company continues to deliver apps which won’t work on Windows 10 (especially Mobile) or leave its own applications for Windows languishing behind versions for other platforms. Talk about undermining your own message.

Hardware? Microsoft claims that it only wants to do hardware to fill in gaps in its partners offerings. So how does the Surface Book exist, when it competes directly with the premium offerings from the likes of Dell, HP and Lenovo? Cherry picking the lucrative high end market doesn’t seem like a particularly partner friendly route.

Right now Microsoft seems to be a group of companies all pulling against each other – a state of affairs that has apparently been endemic to the organisation throughout its lifetime and doesn’t seem to be improving. Contrast this with the laser-like focus of Apple, or the targeted-scatter approach of Google and you get the feeling that Microsoft is in a worse place today than when Steve Ballmer was replaced by Satya Nadella two years ago.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.