Skip to main content

If The Pixel Is Nearly As Good As An iPhone, Why Not Just Get An iPhone?

The Google Pixel offers a very specific take on what Android should be, Google's take in fact. And it turns out that Google's take on an Android phone is an iPhone. Almost.

That seems like a problem to me. Why go for an imitation, albeit a very good one, when you can have the original?

The problem is that Google had taken all of the reasons why you might choose to pass on the iPhone and drop them into the Pixel.

So if you were hoping for display out through the Pixel's USB-C port you'll be disappointed. Support for wireless display standards like Miracast is missing too. No expansion and no replaceable battery, unsurprising given their absence on the Nexus line. Google has failed to deliver water ingress protection or Optical Image Stabilisation, two things even Apple added this year.

Google has also managed to rip off the iPhone 6 design without managing to make a more attractive device. And whilst the iPhone has a whole army of third party accessory developers and companies producing clever add-ons and software experiences, the Pixel is starting from scratch.

The Pixel's camera may be close to the performance of the iPhone 7, although without OIS it's been underperforming in low light tests, but it doesn't seem to be a better experience or produce significantly better photos. The XL misses out on the iPhone 7 Plus's dual camera setup too, an 'innovation' that shouldn't be underestimated in the consumer market.

Ironic, then, that it was HTC (OEM for the Pixel) who first experimented with dual camera arrays on smartphones..

To me the Pixel seems to serve the same market as the Nexus - an Android phone with good upgrades. For everybody else it takes all of the perceived failures of the iPhone, adds them to all the inherent weaknesses of Android and then wraps them up in an offering that takes Google deeper than ever before into your personal information.

Does that sound like a winning proposition to you?


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…