Skip to main content

IBM Claims Macs Are Cheaper Than PCs Using Self Interest As A Metric


IBM may be one of the industries biggest names but it has been in a decades long slide as it tries to transform its business into something with a future. At Jamf's User Conference this week IBM reported that Mac enterprise support costs less than a third of that of a PC.

So, just to be clear, at a conference for a company that creates enterprise management software for Apple devices, a company that recently signed a major partnership with Apple to promote Apple devices in enterprise said that Apple was cheaper for enterprise customers. I never saw that one coming.

I'd like to see how IBM backs that claim up when challenged.

For example, IBM started placing Macs with user just over a year ago. Has it normalised its cost figures for the comparitive ages of the machines, given that around 40% of its fleet would be greater than three years old in the same time frame? Or perhaps it has reflected like for like usage patterns to demonstrate the comparitive costs for users undertaking the same work, in the same environment with the same tools on the two different machines.

What about the level of users being offered a Mac? 73% of IBM users offered a choice took a Mac. Which suggests that most users didn't get the choice. Do we think those users were management staff whose workload is very different to their junior staff? Did this account for the senior staff having more experience and better computer skills. We'll have to guess because IBM hasn't told us. Do they even know?

I suspect not. I also suspect that no other verification of its data has been made over and above finding the headline figure that projects IBM interests in the best light.

For anyone who has had the pleasure of managing large fleets of PCs, Windows or Mac; this brand of pseudo-statistics, amounting to little more than marketing wrapped up as research, can be very frustrating because it gets adopted as gospel by people who don't know any better.

Total cost of ownership of any PC fleet is a very coarse average and you should be careful about any claims by any vendor about what it can and can't save you. Especially when the claim is being made by those with a vested interest in what you perceive to be true.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.