Skip to main content

Has Apple Given Up On OS X And The Desktop?

As predicted, Apple gave a debut to new MacBook hardware this morning, with a refresh of internals, new ports and the new Touch Bar, all as expected. The 11" MacBook Air got culled today, whilst the 13" version remains unchanged.

It was without doubt the very definition of 'ho-hum'. This wasn't a refresh of a currently competitive product, like the MacBook refresh earlier in the year (or Microsoft's make over for the top end of the Surface Book line yesterday). The MacBook Pro is so old Queen Victoria was on the throne when it launched and Britain still had an empire when it was last refreshed.

Still, at least the MacBook is still a capable, if uncompetitive offering. The iMac and Mac Pro look positively prehistoric in light of the advances being made elsewhere.

So an uninteresting set of portable updates, cancelled products and nothing for aging desktop lines. Has Apple decided that OS X is done? Is the plan now to move to a single platform based on iOS?

There are good reasons for doing so. iOS has a fair larger application catalogue and Apple has absolute control over everything available for iOS devices. It's also likely that Apple will find it easier to migrate the touch first iOS interface to the desktop than to retrofit touch to OS X.

If you consider this as a likely end game for Apple than the iPad Pro starts to make a lot more sense. Making and marketing the iPad as a computer as a precursor to iPad laptops and desktops becomes the first step in a transition plan.

Whatever the reason, Apple seems to have limited interest in competing with PC manufacturers for sales and its Mac sales are falling faster than the general PC market contraction. For Apple's fans you have to hope that this is part of a wider plan.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…