Skip to main content

Google Pixel: A Nexus By Any Other Name Is…


So Google took the wraps off its new smartphone today… although it had nothing to add over and above what had been previously leaked or guessed at. HTC manufactured, Google designed with a bigger push around Google’s vision of a device as part of a world with ubiquitous search.

It’s an interesting play, because despite the addition of Google’s name and branding to the phone there isn’t much here over and above what has been offered under the Nexus brand. For all that Google put its stamp on the new device by making and validating all of the design decisions there’s nothing ground breaking about the hardware in this device.

In fact if anything it lags behind Samsung  and Apple in key areas (missing OIS, no water resistance, wireless charging, stereo speakers) that might make it a tougher sell. Google claims the camera scores the highest DxOMark rating ever… let’s wait and see how that works in real life.

So if hardware isn’t a differentiator – and let’s be honest, for what is a natural extension of HTC’s currently unsuccessful line, it’s unlikely to be – does Google have enough of a software and services offering to differentiate it from other Android phones, never mind compete with Apple?

There are signs that there might be. Free, full resolution, cloud image storage is a benefit Google is touting, tied with the automatic offloading of files to the cloud to manage on board storage. This should ease the concerns of the absence of expandable memory.

Like the Nexus line, the Pixel will be kept up to date by Google directly, however in future updates will stream in the background before being installed, minimising downtime. The Pixel will benefit from a new launcher as well as packing Google Assistant rather than the previous Google Now or Now on Tap versions of its intelligent voice assistant.

Google is also proposing to fix its woeful support process – with 24/7 live access to support directly from the phone. It will be interesting to see whether this ends up being a worldwide service and if so how it compares to Apple’s class-leading customer engagement through the Apple Store.

Pricing the Pixel to compete directly with Apple and Samsung is the last major change in Google’s strategy. To justify this price, especially considering the missing hardware features, Google is going to have to deliver a user experience that blows both out of the water. Given how well and how long Apple has been doing this; and how successful Samsung has been in extending the Android experience in new and innovative ways; I’d be more than a little surprised if the Pixels have a major impact on the market.

That might not be the intention of these devices though. Rather they are the equivalent of Microsoft’s Surface, leading Android OEMs in directions that Google wants them to go.

And in that respect the Pixel isn’t very different to the Nexus devices that preceded it.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…