Skip to main content

For Galaxy Note 7 Customers There's More Pain To Come

You'd think that having bought what promised to be the best smartphone on the market, finding out it was a fire hazard and needed to be replaced, getting it replaced and finding out it was still a fire hazard and needed to be returned to never be seen again; that Galaxy Note 7 customers have endured all the suffering that this episode could bring.

Not so. There's a further mess to be sorted out and this time it's going to be rather more widespread and much more difficult to address.


Inevitably the purchase of a new smartphone means the purchase of new accessories too... more so for Note 7 buyers as for the first time for Samsung, it featured a USB-C port which likely meant a whole slew of new add-ons to purchase. New case, extra sync cables, new car charger, for some users a VR headset... and that means a whole host of third party retailers will have been involved.

So whilst those who bought from established outlets like Amazon should be able to tee up a refund without too much hassle, items purchased from smaller retailers aren't going to be quite so easy to return. After all that third-party case you bought from your local accessory shop isn't faulty and it isn't the retailers fault it's now no good to you.

The retailer will itself have a bunch of its own problems. I noticed several stores here in Auckland with large stocks of Note 7 accessories. I doubt very much that the manufacturer will be keen to take them back. Not their fault the Note 7 is no more.

And of course the manufacturer will have their own problems too. Having built stock of Note 7 accessories that they can no longer sell their own profitability will be at stake.

Legally Samsung isn't liable for any of these add on costs, although I expect it will come to some form of accomodation with the larger retailers, networks and Amazon, if for no other reason than it wants to be able to sell new devices in future.

Customers may also be able to go direct to Samsung to discuss these add-on costs they have incurred. Again I expect that Samsung will be sympathetic to a lot of these cases on the basis that screwing over valued customers isn't a great long term business strategy.

I fear that the whole thing will be a long drawn out, messy and inevitably painful process from which nobody will emerge unscarred.



Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…