Skip to main content

Apple's Last Quarter Wasn't Great: Revenue Down, Profits Down, Hardware Down

Now its hard to say a company that turned in $9bn in profit had a bad quarter, but by Apple's ridiculously high standards, this was a bad quarter. The company generated less revenue, created less profit and saw falling hardware sales in a perfect storm that saw Apple have a 'down' financial year for the first time since 2001.

Revenue fell by 9% globally, with China being a stand out, year on year Apple was off  by 30% there.

Hardware sales were down across the board too, off between 5% (iPhone) and 14% (Mac). The imminent announcement of new MacBook hardware probably exacerbated the decline in Mac sales, however the iPhone drop off in sales should be more of a concern, reflecting as it does the same transition period between models of the previous year.

It's inevitable that the next iPhone will offer a bigger update than the disappointing iPhone 7.

iPad volume continues to fall, although the introduction of the more expensive Pro models meant that revenue stayed the same. Those customers buying iPads are migrating towards the high end devices, something that I'm sure will be reflected in the next iPad  refresh, whenever that happens.

Apple's 'Other' category was down in revenue by 22%, although this is more easily explained. We know that Apple Watch sales were 2.8m shy of the same quarter in 2015, in anticipation of the arrival of the Watch 2. At an average selling price of $269 that reduction in Watch sales entirely accounts for the $700m shortfall in revenue.

Apple's 2016 FY hasn't been a disaster, however there are signs customers are wanting to see more from Apple than just humdrum updates or the additions of 'me-too' features. I'm struggling to think of a recent Apple innovation which actually set my technology glands tingling.

That's Apple's biggest risk right now, the maturity of its products and the market in general change the perception of the company from exciting and innovative to boring and out-dated.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…