Skip to main content

An Early Release Of The Galaxy S8 Is Not The Answer That Samsung Needs Right Now

A number of sources are claiming that Samsung will seek to fill the hole left in its range by the loss of the Galaxy Note 7 by doubling down on Galaxy S8 development with a view to having the new phone launched at the beginning of 2017.

That's a mistake, for two reasons.

Firstly, speed is one thing Samsung does not need to demonstrate right now. A excess of care in all aspects of its next flagships gestation is critical here. If senior members of the chaebol, its shareholders and employees think the fallout from the Note 7 episode is bad, just wait until the point when another phone goes bad. There is no leeway for Samsung here, the next phone must be bulletproof. Completely. Absolutely. Without question. Bulletproof.

Secondly, the current Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge are still new devices and with the Note out of the picture resume their places at the head of the smartphone queue. Samsung previously had the three best smartphones you could buy in their portfolio. That is now two, but two that are still head and shoulders above the competition. Neither phones are in desperate need of replacement and with no new iPhone due for around eight to ten months and Google's Pixel likely to be in constrained supply, the S7 is still a powerful choice on the showroom floor.

It's also been out on the market long enough to insulate itself from any taint of the Note 7 fire scandal. If the S7 had the same problem it would have been more than obvious by now.

There's plenty of pain coming Samsung's way over the next couple of years but the quality of the S7 and S7 Edge at least offers some buffer for the company to try and improve its processes so that it never goes down the same path again.

The best phone you can currently buy is still a Samsung. Now Samsung needs to leverage that fact to make sure customers are still prepared to buy a Samsung.



Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…