Skip to main content

A Week Without Windows: Day Three, Week One


Having created a usable portable setup and an acceptable desktop replacement from my Galaxy Tab S2 over the last couple of days and proven that, in the short term at least, you can live in the Google / Samsung environment today I've set out to see what the advantages of such a setup might be.

Portability would certainly be an expected benefit. In theory my Tab S2 and portable keyboard are a lot lighter than my laptop, but that's only a benefit brought on by the hardware I've selected. Whilst 8" Windows tablets are rare they do still exist. And if you accept that 10" is the smallest screen you should be using for any kind of work then the choice of Windows tablets increases immeasurably.

Cost might have one been a perceived benefit of picking Android over Windows but that's no longer the case. A usable Windows tablet costs no more than the equivalent Android and Microsoft will definitely keep it more up to date than Google will.

Realistically the only major advantage that using Android brings is when used as a portable device. Then the Play Store software offering, the better battery life and the phone centric OS comes into its own.

It feels unlikely that you'll use a tablet - even an 8" one as your main portable device just because a smartphone is always going to be much more convenient.

It's becoming more and more clear as I go through this week on Android that whilst you can replace a Windows PC with an Android device, there is a layer of complexity added to everything you then do with it.

Once Google finishes merging Android and Chromebook there will almost certainly be a better Windows competitor created. Until then it's not going to be enough for most people to give up Windows.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…