Skip to main content

With Andromeda Can Google Use Mobile Momentum To Break Windows?

google_pixel_chromebook_hero

What’s the most popular operating system in use in the world today? If you said Android, you’re spot on, if you said Windows, that’s probably something of a surprise. However popular Android is, Google appears to have lost control of its platform, to the point where fragmentation, both in versions and also in forks, has run away with it and there’s no opportunity to put the genie back into the box.

The rumours of a merger of Android and Chrome OS to create a new, all pervasive platform, sound like an attempt to build a new box. One that Google controls and one that leverages the best of both of its parent platforms to create a user experience that puts Microsoft on notice.

Android is everywhere, it is powerful and somewhat flexible. Chrome OS is constantly up to date, supports larger screen sizes and runs fluidly on a variety of hardware. Between them they have the capability to create a single, viable alternative to Windows. Chrome OS is already outselling MacOS in several market segments, notably in Apple’s former stronghold of education.

The problem is that Google has a significant gap between concept and execution, one that has beleaguered almost everything it has released since Android. How many messaging clients, social platforms and devices have come and gone as Google struggled to make them work and get customers to adopt them?

Given the speed with which Microsoft has been iterating through Windows 10 releases and updates it seems unlikely that an upstart OS from Google could quickly rise to compete.

This is where Google’s momentum with Android comes into play. A new platform where Google maintains a much tighter control of ownership and distribution, locks down vendor customisations, preventing fragmentation and enforcing a device independent upgrade mechanism changes the mobile market initially. The new platform offers an easy upgrade for existing Android owners.

Pushing all of those advantages, plus the Play Store, onto desktop class devices offers the potential for a much bigger change on the desktop. Common functionality between desktop and mobile, the ability to morph one device into another (much like Continuum, but with lighter requirements and a wider app base) as well as all of the Handoff-like functionality that Android can already offer, these are all attractive selling points for users who haven’t upgraded a PC in half a decade or more.

Microsoft might find that its inability to compete the mobile space comes back to bite it hard here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.