Skip to main content

Windows, Mac, iOS, or Android? Why Only You Know What’s Best For You


I had an interesting conversation with an acquaintance the other day, someone who I’m on nodding terms with, but don’t actually know at all.

I mentioned that one of the things I was planning to get a new laptop for my son. His immediate response was to tell me that I should get a Mac. In fact it went beyond that to the point where he told me that I should get a Mac, an iPhone and an iPad and that I would be crazy to buy or use anything but Apple products.

Without knowing anything about me or my son’s needs for a laptop.

The fact that he was pushing Apple isn’t key to this story, it would be just as relevant if he’d have been telling me to buy Windows or Android or even Ubuntu.

This sort of experience based advice is of very little value when you’re looking to buy something for your own needs because there is never going to be a true correlation between you uses and needs.

I have no doubt that my acquaintance is very happy with his Apple equipment and it serves his purpose well. More power to his elbow. In this instance I knew that an Apple laptop wasn’t going to fit the bill for a whole variety of reasons relating to what my son wanted and needed; as well as the demands of his schoolwork. I know this because I took the time to do some research before deciding what tool was appropriate for the job.

It helps that I also own and use the full Apple, Microsoft, Google and Ubuntu software / hardware stack on a regular basis and know what each can and can’t do.

There are many people who will give you inappropriate advice (not just about computers either). some experts call it false authority syndrome. A person who feels able to give advice on a subject, based on limited knowledge, hearsay and without any data to base those assertions on. They can be dangerous, especially in business where they can influence company policies based on no evidence at all.

So the next time you received unrequested advice from a person without any proven expertise in the subject under discussion I suggest you nod wisely and ignore every word.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…