Skip to main content

This Might Have Been Apple’s Biggest Keynote Item And Nobody’s Talking About It


So amongst all the headphone jack, AirPod and Watch hullabaloo, Apple introduced some changes to iWork to make its Office suite much more than just a bundled application that arrives with your iPad or Mac and probably never gets used.

The addition of collaboration features to iWork applications may seem like a small step, but it has been a feature which Google offers in Docs and of course is a mainstay of Office 365. The absence of this capability has been a notable gap in the iWork armoury.

Does this mark a turning point for iWork, which doesn’t seem to have been a particularly valuable product for Apple thus far?

Apple’s recent iPad Pro introductions suggest that it wants to move into the PC space in a larger way and it can’t really do that based on the cut down mobile versions of Office that Microsoft offers for iOS. To be taken seriously in the consumer and prosumer space the iPad needs a real office suite that offers feature compatibility with Microsoft Office and Google Docs.

In the same way that the iPhone has eased both Microsoft and Blackberry out of the enterprise smartphone space, iWork has the potential to reduce the domination of Microsoft Office – if that is what Apple wants it to do. Large scale enterprise will always be tied to Office, because it always has been. For everyone else iWork is probably good enough. It’s a message that Google Docs has been delivering for years.

Now it appears Apple has got the message and wants to play too.

A solid office suite is exactly the sort of thing that forms the backbone of a productive services offering and as Apple pivots towards this lucrative market bringing, iWork up to feature compatibility is an important goal.

So forget the headline features you saw last week. Apple bringing its aim around to Google Docs and Office 365 is about the biggest thing to happen in technology this year. iCloud reliability and performance nothwithstanding, there’s a whole market out there just waiting for an Apple-style disruption.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…