Skip to main content

Sony Xperia XZ - Is It Good Enough?

The Xperia Z went through six different version without changing very much at all. In fact it's probably fair to say that Sony caused itself far too many problems by iterating its flagship too quickly. The basic concept was good - a powerful, waterproof phone with a top quality camera and a very lightweight Android skin. The execution was less so.

Now the Z is dead and Sony has moved up the alphabet to the X, where we currently have three models: the entry-level XA, the mid range X and the high end X Performance.

Today we got the XZ. This is so very similar to the X Performance that you have to question why both phones exist. The XZ has a bigger screen (5.2" v 5") a larger battery (2900mAh v 2700 mAh) and a new sensing pack for its camera which combines IR and laser focusing and a second image sensor for depth / focusing / movement detection. USB-C replaces micro-USB and  there's a new blended bevel design to set it apart from its stablemate.

It isn't the Xperia Performance that it will be competing against though.

Given that the phone ships with a 1080p screen, rather than QuadHD, one that also lacks AMOLED, that it still lacks OIS and is likely to suffer from Sony's inability to deliver high quality image processing on its own handsets, the suggestion that this is a handset that will compete at the premium end of the market with the S7 or iPhone seems something of a stretch.

Still, there's no question that Sony builds a good looking handset and this is as good as the best, for now. Sony's prioritisation of profits over volume is likely to make this a step to far for anyone who isn't already an Xperia fan, but for those Sony-philes this is probably going to be too good to miss.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…