Skip to main content

Sony Just Doesn’t Know When To Stop

Xperia-X-Performance-Black

Sony has had a chequered recent history with smartphones. Its Xperia Z range has been one of the better premium devices on the market for each year since its launch, however it has struggled to deliver quality in the mid and lower segments of the market.

The net result has been that the Mobile Division has swung between wild losses and small profits ever since buying Ericsson out of the joint venture.

Last year the company refocused its efforts. Fewer phones and a focus on profits.

With the Xperia Z5 we saw that Sony could build a decent phone and sell it for a profit. Given that the Z5 had arrived just four months after its predecessor, which itself followed the Z3 within seven months it was clear that a change was needed. The Z5 needed to be Sony’s last premium phone for a while and it needed to fill in its range with a couple of decent mid-level phones.

So you’ll probably be surprised to find out that, within the ten months since the Z5 arrived Sony managed to pump out eight new devices, more than half of which could have been considered Z5 replacements.

Most recently Sony gave us the Xperia XZ. A lovely looking phone with lots of new features. But one which followed the X Performance as the third range topping smartphone in less than a year.

There’s no need for it but it appears that Sony can’t help itself. The Xperia line is a confusing mismatch of all too similar phones competing in the same small niches. It serves the company poorly to be producing this level of confusion amongst retailers, bloggers and ultimately customers; who can never be confident when pulling the trigger on an Xperia purchase what craziness is coming next.

Right now I can walk into a mobile retailer and see the Xperia Z5, X, X Performance and, shortly, XZ on offer. With these devices retailing at (NZ) $600, $700 and $800 how is Sony going to persuade buyers to invest in the XZ at potentially $1200? Do the updates to the XZ really make it worth double the Z5’s current asking price.

Sony needs to learn restraint. Right now the Android premium market has been blown wide open by Samsung’s troubles. A cohesive, consistent range and above all, a range with a visible and sensible shelf life would have allowed it to grab some of those sales that would otherwise have gone to Samsung.

Instead Apple and Huawei will make hay, picking up sales whilst Sony ponders its next dozen phones for the rest of this year.

The Xperia Z5 was a pretty good phone that only now requires replacement. If Sony can’t control its need to keep replacing phones that are just a few months old its going to find that even its new, more modest, ambitions are unachievable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…