Skip to main content

Samsung’s ‘Safe’ Note 7 Identifier Isn’t Robust Enough


Samsung is deep into the process of shipping out replacement Note 7 handsets to those affected by the battery fault recall. Despite doing a reasonably good job of managing the recall, offering loan handsets, replacement devices or refunds there is one glaring issue that Samsung hasn’t properly addressed: how do I identify a ‘good’ Note 7 from a bad one?

Samsung’s guidance is that new ‘safe’ handsets will have marked boxes (not useful if the box isn’t with the device) and sport a green battery icon in three places in the device software, indicating the battery is good and you can treat the device as any other handset.

Android being what it is though, I don’t believe that’s even close to good enough.

Replacement ROMs, software skins, even root enabled hacks offer the unscrupulous an opportunity to pass a faulty Note 7 off as a good one, just by changing through items on the device. Given that the faulty handsets are likely to be worthless and remediated ones quite valuable on the second-hand market – even with the reputational hit this recall has caused – there seems to be an easy line between procuring the faulty handset and turning it on at a profit.

Samsung needs to provide a better, more secure method of identifying safe devices. Given that it has a secure store tool on the device for storing fingerprint and payment information surely there must be some way of leveraging that feature to provide a more credible indicator of device safety?

As it stands today I would suggest that the purchase of a second-hand Note 7 sometime in the future would be a very risky transaction. If many others feel the same the residual value of the Note 7 will take a serious hit, making the purchase of a new Note 7 a much worse deal than otherwise.

If you are thinking of buying a Note 7 (and it remains the best all round phone on the market today so why wouldn’t you?) then I would strongly suggest you leverage either your carrier or Samsung’s trade-up deal to fix your residual value up front and ensure that there are no nasty surprises when it comes to replacement.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…