Skip to main content

Is Apple About To Break The Bluetooth Standard For Audio?


We know that Apple is about to ditch the headphone jack on the new iPhone 7, it’s been leaked and reposted by so many different sources it’s hard to believe they could all be mistaken. The assumption has been that Apple would replace them with a set of Lightning Earpods in the box and Bluetooth headphones as an optional upsell, or possibly as an in the box bonus for high end iPhone buyers.

In the last 24 hours however there are new whispers that suggest Apple is about to break the wireless headphone model by ditching Bluetooth for its new headphones (almost universally leaked as ‘Airpods’.

This is an intriguing rumour which raises many questions. Will the new iPhone support both Bluetooth A2DP and AVCRP protocols for music playback and control or will Apple kill them in favour of its own proprietary protocol. If it’s the latter it would allow Apple to control sales of all headphones for the iPhone, wired or wireless, by virtue of its ‘Made for iPhone’ certification initiative. A nice little earner.

It has a major downside of potential iPhone owners if it does drop these standards though: every single Bluetooth device, including portable speakers, cars and music systems, becomes obsolete to the new iPhone owner.

For that reason I can’t see Apple doing something as drastic as this.

More so, I’m at a loss as to why Apple would create a new proprietary standard for its Airpods, as it would block sales to existing iPhone users – and for Beats branded sets – sales to Android owners who might be tempted to try them out.

As a late-breaking rumour its a good one, but it raises more questions than it answers. We won’t have to wait long to find out though.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…