Skip to main content

Improve Iris Scanning Speed And Accuracy On Your Lumia 950

windows hello

The Lumia 950 and 950 XL were the first production phones to utilise iris recognition for biometric authentication. Unfortunately Microsoft rushed the introduction of its new phones and as a result there were a number of items within the Windows 10 Mobile build that didn’t work well, or were rather erratic – iris scanning was certainly one of those.

A key feature of Windows 10 Mobile has been the speed with which Microsoft have released updates improving capability and functionality and one of the big beneficiaries of these updates has been the Windows Hello feature.

I don’t believe that iris scanning will ever reach the speed of a good fingerprint scanner, however I’m convinced after using it with the latest Windows 10 Mobile updates that the additional time spent unlocking the phone is a small price to pay for the extra convenience and security. In short, after using iris scanning on the Lumia 950 fingerprint scanners seem like a very clunky option.

You can speed up the recognition time and accuracy by slightly changing the way you interact with the iris scanner and the gains are palpable.

First of all make sure that you’ve run through the ‘Improve recognition’ feature of Windows Hello in different lighting situations, with and without your glasses / contacts. The more times you run the recognition the  better the performance.

When using the iris scanner to unlock, your phone needs to be held around 10” / 25cm from your face and your face needs to more or less parallel to the phone’s screen. Hold the phone slightly to the left of your face’s centreline, with the IR emitter in line with the bridge of your nose. Look directly at the emitter.

By following these tips I’ve found that recognition performance is excellent. If your experience is different then give this a go and see how it works for you.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…