Skip to main content

HP’s Buyout Of Samsung Printing Is All About Enterprise

samsung mfd

The news that HP has bought out Samsung’s printer business has provoked two reactions almost globally. Firstly, who knew Samsung had a printer business and, secondly, does anyone actually print any more?

Where you see these reactions you can be sure that your reading someone with a narrow view of the technology business. Samsung’s printer business was worth $1bn to HP. Not the biggest buyout ever but still a sizeable organization.

More importantly, many people are getting their eyes opened to the world of enterprise MFP and the cut throat battles to win sizeable contracts that involve manufacturers, partners and elaborate tender processes designed to squeeze the lowest cost for all enterprise printing.

MFPs (multi-function printers) have arrived in the enterprise in a big way over the last fifteen years. From a model which saw users PCs attached to individual printers, we now have network printing that is charged on a per copy basis, with secure print jobs, follow-me printing, scan to email, scan to storage and all of the other enterprise features that are now taken for granted.

The value for printer manufacturers is immense. Based on print volumes of many millions of pages per month, earning a fraction of a penny profit per page adds up to sizeable chunks of income. Multiply that by the large numbers of enterprise contracts out there and you’ll see why HP felt they could afford to pay $1bn for Samsung’s print division.

The paperless office is a pipe dream that nobody with an understanding of the way the enterprise works believes in any more. In that light HP’s acquisition makes an awful lot of sense.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…