Skip to main content

How Would A Surface AIO Fit Microsoft’s Cloud-First, Mobile-First Strategy?

surfacepro4

So, Microsoft and hardware, what’s the score. Surface tablets? Hit. Lumia phones? Limited success torpedoed by internal indifference. Band fitness trackers? Well received, but unreliable and not a sales success.

It’s a patchy record at best. Yet we are told that next month Microsoft will launch three Surface All-in-One devices in a bid to do what exactly?

Coincidentally I have one of the original Windows 8 AIOs – the Sony Vaio Tap 20. It was a disastrous mismatch of hardware and software that worked beautifully when it was running, but crashed and burned far too often to be usable or useful. Not long after getting it I wiped the drive and installed Ubuntu, which ran perfectly, and it still does as a homework machine for my kids.

The touchscreen features weren’t actually hugely useful and the usability benefits of an enormous tablet weren’t immediately obvious. Buyers of Samsung’s big screen Android tablet have reported similar experiences.

However as a desktop with a touchscreen the Vaio Tap 20 works well. Given that Windows 10 is best used with mouse, keyboard and touchscreen combined I see no reason why the proposed Surface AIO wouldn’t be similarly wonderful.

However that still doesn’t answer the question why? When Surface tablets were launched they were built to showcase how good Windows could be on a tablet, something Microsoft felt its partners weren’t willing or able to do. Over time that message has indeed got through (even if the side show of Windows RT mixed the message badly). Microsoft partners have upped their game and the Surface is now just one of a plethora of similarly wonderful Windows 10 portables.

That same reason for building an AIO doesn’t exist. There are many, good AIO machines available that don’t really leave much functionality on the table.

Which leads me to believe that if Microsoft has built an AIO for the home it must be because it has a hook that will make it a compelling device to own. This would need to be a pretty impressive advance to make it worth getting into a shrinking market and competing with its own partners. Something that it has said it won’t do in the smartphone space.

Alternatively Microsoft has played the media for fools and its October release will feature a new range of Surface tablets and Surface Books, as well as a Surface Phone and Band 3.

But I wouldn’t hold your breath.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.