Skip to main content

Backing Up Your Backup Becomes Easier With SanDisk’s New 1TB SDXC Offering


Data usage is growing exponentially. We’re taking a lot more photos with our smartphone cameras and as those cameras take higher resolution pictures with more and more additional features, each photo takes up more space. Pushing them off your device and into the cloud, maybe onto local external storage too, has become the default way of dealing with these additional storage demands.

Of course if all of your documents, files, music and videos are stored in the cloud you become beholden to your cloud service provider’s reliability to ensure that you can get those files back again when you need them.

Some cloud services are more reliable than others.

OneDrive has been one of the best in my experience, in fact in the years that I’ve used it (including under previous SkyDrive, Live Sync and Live Mesh guises) I have yet to suffer an outage.

However the SD card slot on the side of my HP Spectre x360 offered me the opportunity to mitigate even this unlikely scenario. By adding a 256GB card and setting OneDrive to sync its folders to the card I am always able to access the contents of my OneDrive, irrespective of what’s happening at Microsoft or my local internet connection.

However as my OneDrive storage starts to fill up (I have 1.25TB of space at the moment) that 256GB card isn’t going to be up to the job for much longer. So the news that SanDisk has announced a 1TB SDXC card obviously caught my eye.

At the current increase in storage consumption, the 1TB card will have dropped into the realms of affordability just when I need it.

Backing up your data is more than just about having it stored somewhere other than your computer. It should also be about availability. Your data is no good to you locked away on Apple’s servers if iCloud is down, or you’ve lost internet access; marginally more so if its on a hard disk back at home when your SSD dies on the road.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…