Skip to main content

Apple Gets Hit With Back Taxes, But Where’s The Punishment For Irish Government Collusion?


So the EU has given its verdict on Ireland’s tax breaks for Apple and they are damning. Effectively significant amounts of state aid given to Apple in order to bring a limited number of jobs to Ireland and in the process allow Apple to dodge its tax liabilities across the whole EMEA region.

Despite Tim Cook’s protestations it is clear that Apple knew what it was doing here, taking advantage of a weak (and apparently desperate) Irish Government in order to pocket billions of Euros in unpaid tax liabilities. That it has been told to repay the missing taxes should not be a surprise. That it will appeal shouldn’t be either. Let’s hope the EU stands up for the people and endorses this decision.

The US has been making threatening noises about this judgement going against Apple. It needs to sit down and shut up. These are taxes that were mainly due in Europe and should be paid in Europe. If the US hasn’t worked out how it can tax Apple for its offshore holdings then it should be supportive of any method of taxation which promotes the repatronisation of those moneys. And ensuring that Apple pays an appropriate level of tax wherever it recognises its profit is one way of doing this.

More importantly where are the punitive measures against the Irish Government, who effectively colluded with Apple to provide a bolt hole to defraud other European Governments of tax dollars owed on sales within their borders? In prostituting itself so openly to large corporations the Irish Government has revealed itself to fall far short of the standards of morality that those in power should be held to.

To follow the Irish model introduces a race to the bottom. Ireland offers Apple a 1% rate, Poland retaliates with a 0.5% rate and Britain goes all in at 0%. Which country starts giving big business Corporation Tax rebates to entice to develop there?

What I should emphasise is that Apple has done nothing wrong here, the job of the Board is to maximise shareholder value. In taking up Ireland’s very generous offer and using it to minimise tax liability it has followed that requirement to the letter.

However it is the job of governments to ensure a fair and equitable tax structure that does not allow big business to push the tax burden onto the individual. The Irish Government failed so badly in this duty that a new word needs to be invented to describe this level of fail.

Apple now needs to pay its tax bill and be a good member of the community. Appealing and arguing it was an innocent party to the Irish Government’s siren call won’t wash.

And Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft it’s time to look to your tax liabilities, because the EU looks to be playing hard ball here and you’re next up to bat.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…