Skip to main content

Sony Should Demolish Its Smartphone Ambitions With Its Flagship Ginza Store


Sony’s Xperia X has been poorly received by the media, a backward step from its quasi-successful Z range and wildly overpriced to boot it is a phone designed to maximise profits at the expense of user experience and value.

Symbolically, after fifty years Sony is about to demolish its flagship Ginza building in Tokyo, it should take its smartphone division with it.

If Sony has been unable to build a smartphone business when it has been building some of the best smartphones you can buy, what hope is there for it when it lags behind the competition so woefully? The company has managed to be poor at everything to do with selling phones: poor marketing, poor engagement with the carriers (especially in the US) and failing to follow through on its successes.

Never having product to sell until too long after launch has not helped.

At a time when your smartphone division is fighting for its life the availability of more Sony accessories for iPhones than Xperias is a crazy kind of commercial suicide. Its’s as if Sony forgot exactly what consumers look for when they’re buying.

Part of me wants to pick up an Xperia Z5 for old times sake, to remember the potential that I saw in the Z1 and even the X10 before it, but then I remember why I passed on it when it launched. In every way possible the Samsung GS7 is a better Android phone. The comparison between the two is so one-sided it’s embarrassing.

So Sony, knock down your building, shut up your smartphone shop and concentrate on component supply. You’re done.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…