Skip to main content

OLED Screens To Drastically Change iOS

It seems that we may have finally reached the point where we can say that Apple is going to switch its number one product to a new screen technology. OLED manufacturers have been stretching their capability and news that Samsung, the manufacturer of the best AMOLED screens available, was readying capacity for a massive growth in its larger 5.5" screen shipments.

Alongside the news that Apple has included 'dark mode' within the iOS 10 developer seed code, albeit well hidden, this looks like pretty conclusive proof of a coming change in screen technology.

Why? Because OLED screens are much more power efficient when displaying darker images, something that the predominantly light coloured iOS 9 doesn't support well. Also OLED screens are prone to image burn in when displaying bright, static images for long periods.

That might prove to be a problem for Apple, given that even in dark mode much of the iOS interface is static, and white text on black backgrounds are just as likely to damage the screen. In any case the presence of dark mode means that Apple believes it can resolve this problem easily enough.

The other challenge for Apple will be maintaining is famed screen colour accuracy. Whilst Samsung has delivered hugely impressive screens that deliver excellent colour standards, other OLED manufacturers have been less successful in this respect. A poorly calibrated screen could be a disaster for any new iPhone.

On the plus side, iPhone owners will no longer need to look at their Samsung owning peers and sigh over the incredible colours and deep blacks that have been denied them thus far.

Apple just needs to be careful about how it integrates this new technology into the new iPhone. Because denied the advantage of its beautiful screen a Samsung Galaxy looks a much harder sell against any new iPhone.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…