Skip to main content

Office 365 Represents Amazing Value Right Now


About a year ago I picked up a Surface 3, which turned out to be a surprisingly useful replacement for my laptop and tablet. Included in the bundle was a twelve month subscription to Office 365 Personal, providing the latest version of Microsoft's flagship Office product (currently Office 2016) and 1TB of online storage through OneDrive.

With those twelve months being all but up I started looking into a renewal thinking that I would probably allow the subscription to lapse. In fact my original plan was to write this post comparing the boxed, retail purchasing cost to the annual subscription with the expectation being that the latter would prove to be uneconomic in the long run.

Turns out that isn't the case.

Office 365 Personal is listed at NZ $119 on Microsoft's New Zealand web site, however a quick trawl through PriceSpy proves that you can get it cheaper. Much cheaper. $75 in this case.

Just considering the storage alone this looks like amazing value. A Dropbox subscription runs NZ $170 as does an upgrade to Google Drive. Meanwhile will demand NZ$130 for just 100GB of storage or around NZ $270 for an unlimited pot.

The 1TB of OneDrive storage is worth the price of admission on its own.

The copy of Office 2016 is just a bonus freebie in that particular deal. When you factor in the NZ $199 price for the boxed copy you'll see how far the balance tips in Office 365's favour. Best of all OneDrive and Office run just about anywhere, either as a native client or via the web. So you can enjoy your purchase on just about any piece of hardware you own.

So, far from being the financial black hole I was expecting, Office 365 actually offers pretty good value. As long as you make use of that online storage anyway.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…