Skip to main content

Microsoft Needs To Kill Mixed Messages About Windows Tap To Pay Support


Last week Daniel Rubino of the Windows Central site bought a hamburger from a Mcdonalds using a Lumia 950. This was possible because his Lumia was running the latest Windows 10 Mobile Insider build and had the new Waller 2.0 app from Microsoft. That he used a bank card from Bank of America was pertinent too, as the BoA supports Paywave payments by smartphone.

Since the news broke there has been rumour layered upon rumour about Wallet 2.0 – what will support it, what won’t and, with the already fractured relationship between Microsoft and its customers getting more strained by the day a certain degree of FUD has been introduced to the conversation.

That was multiplied by a Mastercard document which suggested that only the Lumia 640XL non-LTE, 650, 950 and 950XL were Host Card Emulation compatible and as that’s the technology Microsoft will be using to provide the Tap to Pay service there were some disappointed users out there.

However Microsoft’s own developer blogs on MSDN provide detailed instructions on how to enable HCE on NFC. The post, from May last year specifically calls out a number of Lumias with NFC HCE support: (730/830/640/640XL …).

That’s a wider and more inclusive range of devices than the Mastercard document and additionally calls out support for SIM-based emulation, as used in services like New Zealand’s Semble payment system.

Microsoft needs to step up here and make a clear statement about which of its devices will actually work with HCE, because the last thing it needs after mismanaging the Windows 10 Mobile compatibility list, is another reason for loyal customers to go elsewhere.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…