Skip to main content

LinkedIn Isn’t A Facebook For Business

Startup Stock Photos

In many industries it is derigeur to have a profile on LinkedIn, the service is vital for business networking, for making yourself approachable to vendors, customers, recruitment consultants and colleagues.

It is not a site where you go for social or non-business discussions or even to engage with potential clients / customers.

So suggestions that Microsoft intends to turn LinkedIn into the future Facebook of business should be taken with a large pinch of salt.

Facebook has value because we engage with people we know on it, we like and comment on things that tell Facebook the sort of people we are – and by association what sort of people are friends are – and they can package this information up in a way that is attractive to advertisers and can generate a handsome income. We get easy social interaction, advertisers get targeted marketing opportunities and Facebook gets paid for making it all happen.

LinkedIn has very little value in this respect. Chances are that you, like many others, perform the perfunctory LinkedIn activities that good manners demand. The service even makes it easy to do this without needing to engage in any way shape or form.

Yes there is a sort of news feed, with posts published by your contacts on the service, but really apart from recruitment consultants and vendors, who have very specific search targets, how much of what you see is of any interest at all?

So if Microsoft envisions LinkedIn as a new social network, possibly with deep integration into Office 365, it has an awfully long road ahead of it. At $26bn I’d suggest it would have been better off starting from scratch.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…