Skip to main content

Is Samsung Planning For A Post-Smartphone World?


Samsung is the world’s number one smartphone manufacturer by volume and the world’s number two by profit, so when the company starts making moves that suggest it sees a change coming in the way that we buy phones, it’s time to sit up and take notice.

First of all an uncredited interview in the Korean Times, reported by Android Authority, suggests that Samsung is going to start backing away from the budget end of the market. That in itself is interesting. New competition from China has meant that Samsung has had to work disproportionately hard to keep its lower end handsets competitive. Even so, the growth of Huawei, ZTE and One+ along with a raft of less well known names, has created tough market conditions for Samsung.

Abandoning this low end market will improve Samsung’s profit margins, but the effect is likely to be a short-term panacea.

Recent phones from the same companies that have been making life difficult at the bottom end of the market, have shown that they can compete at the middle and even the premium end too. So whilst Samsung’s GS7 is far and away the best premium Android phone you can buy, the gap between it and the Huawei P9 is far smaller than the gap between the GS5 and the P6 ever was. And the GS5 was hardly a well received phone. For the GS8 and P10 those positions might actually be reversed.

This is where Samsung’s investment in new screen and memory fabs starts to make sense. Yes it will continue to build phones, and class leading premium ones at that. However now it will look to profit from component supply in order to make up for the revenue lost in handset sales.

The arrangement to sell AMOLED panels to Apple fits this plan perfectly. I’m sure that Apple would have loved to get Samsung’s panels into its flagship devices, there’s no question that they are the best available. The problem was twofold.

Firstly capacity, Samsung would not have had the capacity to manufacture its best panels in the volume that would support the Galaxy S and Note lines and provide for iPhone supply as well. Secondly, given that the iPhone and Galaxies were competing for the same customers, supplying Apple with panels would have been a self-harming move. And of course Apple would not have found second best palatable.

Now if Samsung is looking to a future where its smartphones are sold on the basis of premium features and a healthy profit it can be less concerned about competing with Apple and sell its best screens to Apple and rake in the profits there instead.

Where does this leave the rest of the market? It seems inevitable that Huawei is going to end up with the largest slice of the smartphone market, but like the PC and the tablet markets before, smartphones are inevitably going to hit the brick wall as global sales growth stalls.

In a market where iteration has replaced innovation, commoditisation of the smartphone and extended life cycles for the phones we do have, inevitably means that a smaller number of players can be accommodated. Cherry-picking profitable market segments and focussing on component supply seems to be a solid strategy.

In that aspect at least, the news coming out of Samsung makes perfect sense.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…