Skip to main content

Has Tesla Got A Suspension Safety Issue?


Is Tesla hiding a potential safety problem or is the company being attacked for financial or political reasons? Over the last week Tesla has found itself engaged in a battle of words with car blogger Ed Niedermeyer who has claimed that the company has been seeking to silence Model S owners who have been experiencing suspension problems with their cars.

The source of the claim was a forum post claiming that the owner of a faulty 2013 Model S had been bribed to keep quiet over a potential detect by means of a goodwill payment and agreement that prevented discussion of the problem.

This doesn't seem to be consistent with the way that Tesla operates. The cars have proven to be remarkably robust with solid design and execution. The company has a particularly fragile reputation to protect as its role as a key electric vehicle pioneer makes it susceptible to public opinion swings.

Whilst a recall relating to a suspension part would barely move the needle (especially given how many significant major recalls are completed by other car makers every year) the exposure of a cover-up would be catastrophic. It would call into question the inherent safety of all EVs and the very future of Tesla itself.

The risk reward profile is so out of balance that I can't believe any company would chance it, US corporate culture notwithstanding.

So what of the 'gagging' agreement? Looks like nothing more than Tesla says it is, an agreement to prevent the company's gesture being used against it in the future.

In the end the real story appears to be about a high-mileage EV having a component failure for which Tesla has made a reasonably generous part-payment offer.

Given the blogger's past history with Tesla this can probably be dismissed.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…