Skip to main content

Google Ends Support of Early Chromebooks


Five years into the Chromebook 'experiment' Google has more than proved that its web browser based platform can compete against traditional devices, having outsold OS X and Linux in the US last quarter to become the second best selling platform.

However there is the question of long-term support to consider now, as the first batches of third-party Chromebooks start to bump up against Google's five year support cycle. Those early machines will shortly stop getting updates from Google, although they will continue to work. Will this still be the case if a high impact security risk is uncovered though? Google has the ability to shut down these machines permanently, what will happen when it has the motivation too, I wonder?

How does this compare with Microsoft and Apple? Pretty poorly actually. At five years old my MacBook Air is running the latest version of OS X whilst my Acer Timeline, which is approaching six years old, received Windows 10, and continues to see updates along with every other Windows 10 machine.

Lest we forget, Microsoft supported Windows XP for over a decade.

Now in Google's defence Chromebooks live at the bottom end of the market and as a result the support expectations should be managed accordingly. However it seems that the very nature of Chrome as an operating system should mean that a Chromebook can continue to receive updates up until the point where the hardware demands a performance compromise that owners aren't prepared to tolerate.

In any case security updates should be a given.

Still, if you compare it to the lash up that is the Android update programme, owners can probably consider five years of easy, painless updates something of a win...


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…