Skip to main content

Apple's iOS 10 Features Are Derivative, And That's Okay

 ioS 10

Most of the 'new' features Apple announced for iOS at WWDC this week have been seen elsewhere before. Do a search for iOS 10 and you'll find lots of stories about how this feature came from Android, that one came from Windows, others came from the jailbreak community and at least one came from Blackberry. (That last feels rather too much like grave robbing for my liking).

It's all true. Apple has cribbed features from its competitors and it won't be the first or the last time it does so. However only Apple is doing it all in one place.

As the smartphone market matures so the competing platforms will become more like each other. Ignoring the make-up each device when you get down to detail they start to look, feel and act like each other.

Think of the automobile market. Cars have crystallised around a set of standard design decisions, and new features go from new to standard in months.

Smartphones have reached that point much more quickly than cars and by the same token the same level of duplication has been achieved, with Apple, Google and Microsoft copying each others features mercilessly.

One thing that you can be sure of though is that when Apple follows someone else's lead It does so by improving and refining the ideas that have gone before. Recently it has only run into problems when it has tried to lead.

Apple has proven to be a very good I follower' in the past and that's a tactic it can stick to in future. Both Google and Microsoft can be more adventurous with their platforms. Google has such a large slice of the market that it can risk alienating a few customers. Especially as most of those customers aren't its own, but OEM or carrier customers first and foremost. Microsoft can afford to be more adventurous with Windows 10 Mobile users because the only customers they have left are Windows die-hards and prepared to put up with many failings.

Apple sits between the two and can never have the same risk/ reward profile of the competition. Being care full with what it adds to its crown jewel product is prudent. Especially when Google and Microsoft can take them on its behalf.

Expect more careful and steady behaviour from Apple in the future. Because that is the winning strategy for the middle runner n this three horse race.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.