Skip to main content

Android Or Bust…?

huawei p9

Over the weekend stories were circulating about Huawei’s plans to abandon Android for its own platform in the event that it became disaffected with Google's stewardship of the mobile OS. Aside from stating the obvious, did these stories have any substance?

When I say that these were statements of the obvious, I mean that Huawei, along with every other Android OEM, will have a contingency plan for the day that Google starts to exert some pressure on them. That may be their own platform – as Samsung seeks to do with Tizen, it may be an increase in the  number of handsets running other platforms like Windows 10 Mobile or, most likely, it will be a AOSP homespun version of Android which excludes Google’s services.

The most obvious option would be the latter. It’s relatively easy to do and there are alternatives to the Google Play Store which mean that the loss of Google Mobile Services would be no disaster.

What would be a disaster, however, would be for OEMs to take their own direction and create multiple competing platforms. Already we’ve seen that the market supports a duopoly with a very small third placed competitor. Neither Samsung nor Huawei are powerful enough to make their platform that third choice. Just look at how well Tizen is doing. Now imagine a competitor from Huawei.

Even if OEMs based on the Chinese mainland were to collectively implement a new platform to replace Android on their product lines, can you imagine the reception that would get in the rest of the world? Chilly doesn’t even begin to describe it.

So yes, it’s probably fair to say that Huawei has plans to move if Android if it needs to. But its own platform? No, I really don’t think so.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…